Raisduottar belongs to the hotspot area of Fennoscandian arctic-alpine biodiversity, streching from Duortnosjávri (Totneträsk) in Swedish Lapland to Áltafávli (Indre Altafjord) in Norway

 

Numbers of lime-dependent arctic-alpine species in different Atlas Florae Europae grids; according to the situation in 2003, when the mapping was done for 20% of vascular plants. (Even if lime-rich areas only cover 1-2% of the mountain/tundra landscape, they stand for most of the biodiversity in Fennoscandia); Raisduottar is one of the three hottest spots, along with the Gilbesjávri (Kilpisjärvi, 1) and Duortnosjávri (Torneträsk, 3) areas

 

 

        

 

 

 

Geology and climate contribute. Dolomite (red in the below scheme) is most prevalent in the bottom of the Scandinavian mountain formation, and is thus exposed along the eastern edge of the mountain chain and around “windows” (granite outcrops). The arid climate along the edge counteracts leaching and helps to keep pH in the neutral range. Moreover, reindeer aggregate to lime rich areas (grassy) – impact??

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                                                                                                                             

We conducted a preliminary study, utilizing gradients in reindeer densities caused by differences in grazing policies between Finland, Sweden and Norway and by the exclusion of reindeer from the dolomite rich Malla in NW Finnish Lapland. All work was done in areas where the dolomite cliffs get exposed (either along the east edge of the mountain chain or around “granite windows” within the mountain chain). Main result: local species diversity indifferent to grazing but the abundance of arctic-alpine rarities correlates positively with grazing intensity (Olofsson & Oksanen 2005). Correlations, however, have always alternative explanations – finding correlations is just the start for experiments. 

 

In Norway, migration is mandatory; to help to keep the reindeer within legal summer ranges, the Sámi of Norway have built hundreds of kilometres of reindeer fence across the mountain– tundra landscape in the north. One of these fences – the red line in the figure below -  goes right across the hottest part of the Raisduottar hot spot, creating a sharp contrast of grazing intensity – strong grazing pressure in the summer range, and practically non-grazed “dead angles” (the area surrounded by a blue line). The reason: when reindeer are allowed to enter the autumn range after marking in the corral (the red circle) they rapidly move southwards towards the mushroom rich inland heaths within the angle limited by the blue arrows; hence especially the area to the east of the corral has been very little grazed since the 1960’s. (In spring the reindeer cross the area on broad front as the fence is then snow covered but only graze on the most exposed ridges, the rest is inaccessible)   Þ long term experiment already done. On the west side of the corral the situation is more complicated as a part of the area is now used as a calming down ground after marking to ensure that the does do not move southwards so fast that their calves would risk being left behind.

                              

 

The impact of the contrasting treatments is especially striking in relatively nutrient-poor habitats, where the grazed (left, front) is dominated by unpalatable dwarf shrubs, while palatable grasses and forbs prevail on the intensely grazed summer range (right, back), where productivity is higher, soils are warmer, and nutrient circulation is rapid. (Olofsson et al. 2001, 2004, Olofsson & Oksanen, L. 2002; see also Zimov et al. 1995, Am. Nat. 146:765-794). It may indeed seem strange that unpalatable plants prevail in a lightly grazed area, while palatable plants prevail in the area with intense grazing pressure. However, light grazing is more selective than heavy grazing, making defensive investments more profitable for plants. Moreover, nutrient availability is dramatically higher on the intensely grazed side, which increases the marginal costs of chemical defense, thus favoring resilient plants  (see Oksanen, L. 1990. Predation, herbivory and plant strategies along gradients of primary productivity. - pp. 445-473 in: D. Tilman and  J. Grace, eds. Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press). 

 

   

 

 

In nutrient-rich habitats, herbaceous plants prevail on both sides, but the vegetation is still very different (non-grazed = left; intensely grazed = right) – where do rare species flourish?

 

                                

 

We are studying this right now, using various methods (line transects, transplantations, seeding experiments, short-term manipulations of grazing intensity). The results are still preliminary but an interesting paradox is emerging. Sheer censuses indicate that the majority of the rarities are grazing-favored, whereas the results of transplantations and short-term grazer exclusion experiments are ambiguous or indicate that the most rarities are negatively influenced by grazing.

 

The likely reason for the apparent paradox is different kinds of grazing impacts operate in entirely different time scales; the negative impacts are direct and rapid, the positive impacts are indirect and slow. An example is provided by Viola biflora (not a rare species, but one we have studied in different contexts). In our previous experiment, which lasted for 10 years, we found that this species is strongly favored by exclusion of grazers (left panel, from Moen and Oksanen 1998, Oikos 82: 333-346). On Raisduottar, however, where the involuntary “fence experiment” has lasted for 40 years, this species is among the ones that has most pronounced gained from intense grazing; its yellow flowers decorate the summer range (right panel, right side), while it is practically absent on the other side of the fence (right panel, left side). This indeed depends on the nutrient pool; if the bedrock is sufficiently nutrient rich, V. biflora abounds on both sides of the fence, but its habitat amplitude is wider in areas where reindeer keep nutrients in rapid circulation.    

     

 

 

Even the tall herb meadows in the non-grazed areas (previous page, left) are, in fact, products of past grazing. In the absence of reindeer, such sites would be occupied by willows, with the tall herbs just as a minor component of the community. However, willows are grazing sensitive and disappear from areas preferred by reindeer. Tall herbs are fairly grazing-sensitive, too, but survive at low densities and quickly take over when grazing ceases. Once the tall herbs have become dominants, they easily exclude willow seedlings as willow seeds are tiny and provide no resources for the seedlings. During the 40 grazing-free years, willows have thus got foothold only in disturbed sites (around power line posts, along the access road, in eroding river banks and on gravel bars in braided streams). In all other sites, the tall herbs have stood their ground, indicating that history counts on the tundra.

 

The project is going on; please recall that the above results are preliminary. 

 

Like all arctic-alpine projects, the work on Raisduottar requires a team with a good working spirit, willing to live in a remote place under primitive conditions (only Sámi tepees available as accommodation in this area). I have indeed had the advantage of having such teams – below the 2004 work group collecting Saxifraga oppositifolia for transplantation experiments.

 

 

…and indeed, the team must thrive in the outback, as my students and collaborators have done – coffee break on the tundra